| THE
REALITY OF VISION
Roobina
Karode
Art Critic and Independent Curator.
Only humans
invent utopias and their desire for a perfect world propels
them to seek ' beauty and harmony' in life, even if it means
conveniently diverting their vision from the callousness and
coarseness of the surroundings. Unlike many artists who
develop a natural obsession for the beautiful, nurturing a
utopian vision in art, Rajeev Lochan's work argues that the
contemporary reality has nothing to do with the available
range of cliché images, and it is necessary for him to gear
his art to new situations by locating within them, the
unhackeneyed images that carry a topical meaning.
After several
years his recent set of works have incorporated the human
form in their imagery. Here the figure, who is shown unaware
is actually set up to 'perform' by Lochan. This presented
reality, in a sort of 'cinematographic sequence' in stills,
has images that are implicit with a social criticism, and
staged with a subtle theatricality.
The common
day to day experience has been Lochan's pre-occupation from
the very beginnings of his formal art education. In his
earlier work on canvas, the interiors of man-made
environment were in sharp focus, capturing presences of
social behaviour, neglect, pseudo taste and apathy in the
absence of humans.The paintings injected into ordinary
awareness what tends to be 'overlooked' but needs to be
'looked at' and perhaps even 'looked into'. Later, his
painted photographs of treated ruins and historic cityscapes
ravaged by nature and time, nurtured Lochan's passive and
lonely disposition with their evocative presences. Lochan
continues to make an ordinary vision extraordinary with his
perceptions.
Rajeev
Lochan's interest in the 'aesthetics of the melancholy' is
consistent with this recent group of his works. The day to
day locales, the dark lingering interiors, the relatively
newer human forms juxtaposed alongwith the clutter of
symbolically used debris, speak again, initiating a visual
form made by controlled intervention into the perfected
photographic image. As a painter who uses photography as his
medium, he frees his artistic process from the limited role
of copying and documenting a situation, to express a sort of
anti-convention stance while seeking a personalised
expression.
Born into a
family of painters and poets, his creative inclination was
nurtured early at home. He feels privileged at having had
the guidance of remarkable teachers while studying at the
M.S.University, Baroda- K.G. Subramanyan, Jeram Patel, Gulam
Sheikh, Raghav Kaneria, Jyoti Bhatt, and Nasreen Mohammedi
among them. It was Jyoti Bhatt, Kaneria and Nasreen's
passion for the lens that introduced him to photography as a
creative medium. While Jyoti Bhatt went ahead to use
photography in the preparation of mass dissemination
endeavours like print-making, Lochan pursued it only for its
exclusivity. The contemporary movement in the West in the
60's and 70's called Photo-Realism did enamour Lochan, for
it challenged the artists painterly skills in exacting a
hard edged realism, in replicating the photograph. But for
Lochan, such replication became a boring exercise, and
instead of capturing what he wished to paint, he moved on to
painting on what he photographed. In the continuity of his
purpose to appropriate the innumerable stimuli around, in
their most natural and casual occurrence, he needed a tool
that could freeze the moment for him to enter and intervene
into the frame. His working method necessitated the use of
the camera and Lochan started using the photograph for its
flawless registering of the moment and then gradually made
it the base of his work. The 'temporal deferral' is
important for him, for once the phenomenon is frozen in
space, Lochan's vision of reality starts getting transposed
on to the still image. An equal passion for both manual
(painting) and mechanical (photography) skills, Lochan could
move to an inter-media endeavor where the visualisation of
the work results from such a dual consciousness. Notably,
though the camera is an objectifying lens it obeys the
subjective vision of the seeker, who selects the phenomenon,
positions and shifts the frame around, to capture the banal,
which is the subject for his aesthetic contemplation and
expression. Lochan has had a solitary pursuit where the
painter and photographer merge to author the work.
In the recent
years, the inclusion of the human figure has added another
interesting dimension to his work, that of 'performance'. No
utopian locations, no cosy settings, the frame is precisely
composed with a discomforting incongruence between the self
and surrounding as they invade each other. The human figure
as 'placed' within the 'setting' is made to perform by the
artist. Though often he seems to be caught unawares, he is
intentionally framed in moods of self concern and self
absorption. Far from any heroism or glorification, the
common man as the artist's personified self, caught in
either empty futility, unspecified emotion, detachment from
the immediate, or a mindless gaze, all symbolise an
existential angst, isolated in the midst of all visibility.
One feels immediately, how remote his art is from the merely
photographic. At first glance , the imagery appears as a
stark statement of visual facts, but it actually haunts the
borderline between reality and imagination. Painting on the
photograph, is never an act of cosmetic surgery for him, but
more like a need to 'rework in a mood of reflection'. The
artistic process begins as conceived in 'painting with
light' and then using mixed media on the large silver
gelatine prints. The reinforcement of suggestive and
sensitive details are sharpened for the viewers attention.
Working with a sense of omission, Lochan blurs or lets 'out
of focus' through chemical treatment, portions irrelevant
for the final thematic impact. The image and non image are
articulated alike. In these works he even uses pigments,
commonly used for staining glass for effects of
transparency, porosity, and luminous washes. One notices
pronounced mark making, textures brushed by sandpaper, and a
self invented technique for the granular use of crayon for
some expressive effects. The red, earthy, yellow, blues and
greys predominate amidst the nuances of dark and light
areas. Lochan has now moved on to a minimal, precise
intellectual intervention to communicate through his art.
Lochan's is a
self styled radicality. Facing away from the camera, the
protagonist of Lochan's frame is never confrontational,
addressing the issue in a manner of self absorption. By
never looking into the camera, the figure with its inverted
gaze, makes the viewer enter and participate in the
circumstances of his being. Several of Lochan's images bring
forth the dichotomy of the self and the shadow, the man
trying to touch his own shadow, reach it and gauge its
silent presence. This dematerialised self, stands out in
sharp contrast to the corporeal, sensual body. Amidst the
familiar urban debris, the man seems to search for a lost
world.
Some of the
images are hard hitting in their composition- for instance,
the man truncated and suggestively positioned in the
claustrophobic space between the gruesome geometry of solid
angular bars, suggesting the troubling dialectics of the
self and the world. The tight corners in which the human is
caught and has to wriggle out of, makes this pictorial the
story of the survivor. The precarious placement and lurking
presence of the human, heighten the theatricality of the way
in which the figure has been treated in the frame. He
somehow, becomes a symbolic component in the overall
composition, truncated for the desired effect that is
suggestive rather than overt. In Lochan, whether it is the
sharp edged blade of grass touching the bare body creating a
piercing vibration, or the entrapment of the figure between
the menacing barbed wires, or then the broken corrugated
iron sheet or the mutilated pieces of the woven chair,
everyday observations are transformed into metaphors of pain
and aesthetically turned into signs of a 'brutal beauty'.
Aesthetic vision for Lochan is about seeing within the
familiar the clairvoyance of things. There is no
camouflaging of the irregular and the uneven, as the mute
and sensorial world around - is almost hostile evidence of
corroding time and even space. The sensed futility of the
protagonist's predicament, brings out the temperament of an
indifferent desensitised society.
Perception
for Rajeev is 'ego-centric'. He views everything from his
own vantage point. As an artist, this passive receptivity of
the self is important, in his vision. His work oscillates
between the fluid frontiers of 'seeing' and 'perceiving'.
Instead of conceiving art as total transformation, it is
seen here as a mediation between the artist and the
phenomenon. He is now gradually shifting his lens from
engaging in 'frozen immobility' to 'frozen mobility'. It
seems he has still not felt the need to break out of the
frame. In his collaborative venture though , where the model
is staged 'in- situ', he almost finds an indirect answer to
installation and reveals smilingly, "I discover what is
already installed out there in my environment, and I posture
the human to complete the communication. I transfer on to
the existing reality, my own vision of reality."
|